Showing posts with label legacy. Show all posts
Showing posts with label legacy. Show all posts

Friday, 9 December 2016

Tokyo 2020: UK Sport axe badminton funding despite first Olympic medal in 12 years

 
Bronze winnners Chris Langridge & Marcus Ellis (The Telegraph)

 By Steven Oldham 

A first Olympic medal in 12 years in Rio wasn't sufficient enough for Team GB's elite badminton players as UK Sport today surprisingly withdrew all financial support for the Tokyo 2020 cycle.

The controversial decision to cut badminton's comparatively modest £5.7m funding (in contrast, GB's rowers gained £32.6m towards Rio) leaves the team's top players looking at uncertain futures leading to the next Olympiad. 

Chris Langridge and Marcus Ellis became the country's first badminton players to secure an Olympic medal in over a decade by winning bronze in the men's doubles in Rio. 

UK Sport had only set the team a target of 0-1 medals at this Games, and their statement today gave no reason as to why badminton funding was removed regardless of Langridge and Ellis' success. 

Archery, fencing, weightlifting and wheelchair rugby also became victims of UK Sport's successful but ruthless policy which rewards sports with 'podium potential' only.  

The policy definitely gets results, but at what cost?  The much-discussed legacy of London 2012 in Great Britain will again be debated as the list of non-funded sports grows ever longer. 

Team sports including handball, basketball and synchronised swimming were jettisoned as soon as London was over. The 'Inspire a Generation' tagline will be a failure if children see no progression to the top in these sports.  Basketball is one of the country's most popular sports by participation but the national team will only go so far without solid financial backing.

In contrast, 42% of UK Sport funding now goes to just 4 sports - rowing, athletics, sailing and cycling.

Any potential funding for the new sports to the Olympic programme - including karate, surfing and sports climbing - will be decided at a later date. 

WINNERS AND LOSERS:

Rowing continues to be the best funded Olympic sport, at £32.1m over the next four years. This is down roughly £500,000 on the Rio cycle. Many sports take a small hit as overall funding is reduced by £9m to £265m. 

Britain's shooters are the big winners in this round of funding, with their figures bucking the trend, leaping to £7m from £3.9m. Two bronze medals in Rio could be considered a lesser haul than Peter Wilson's solitary gold medal from London 2012. 

Hockey and gymnastics both receive an extra £2m, with the gold-medal winning exploits of the women's hockey team and double-champion Max Whitlock.

British Cycling, however, has lost over £4m despite dominating once again in Rio, a Games in which Laura Kenny became the most successful British female Olympian of all time.

In the Paralympics, the loss of wheelchair rugby funding is compounded by rises for the majority of other disability sports, including an eye-catching 342% increase in wheelchair fencing funding to £668,000. Para-athletics takes over from swimming as the most funded sport with £11.8m to swimming's £11m.

MORE READING:

Badminton's Olympic legacy boosted by creation of NBL

Olympics: Five cult heroes from Rio 2016 

"Legacy? What legacy?" ask British basketballers, weightlifters and water polo players as UK Sport funding withdrawn

Sunday, 13 April 2014

Badminton's Olympic legacy boosted by creation of NBL

By Steven Oldham

Badminton England's plans for the sport's first UK national league competition is a positive way of sealing a post London 2012 legacy.

The first National Badminton League (NBL) season is due to begin in October and will comprise six franchises - albeit all from England. 

The inaugural line up for the first season then sees university teams from Birmingham, Derby, Loughborough, Nottingham and Surrey compete with a Milton Keynes entry.
 
This promising new development for the sport in the UK, but the lack of geographical spread in the teams may limit popularity in the short term.  With no teams from Scotland, Wales or Northern Ireland initially, (the league is open to expansion in future seasons) it may be left to top players such as Imogen Bankier to bring in interest outside the franchise boundaries.


The first NBL starts in October


A new, shorter format - Twenty20 style - will be used for the competition with matches both live on Sky Sports and streamed online globally.

While detailed coverage information is not yet confirmed, a Sky deal has good and bad points.  The extra money from a satellite deal is always a bonus for a minority sport, but the lack of terrestrial presence - even on the red button - can not be offset by streaming. 

Team GB Olympians and the cream of Team England and imported talent will be on show, and the chance to see future stars is made possible with the mandatory inclusion of two players under 21 in each eight person team.  University players may also be used.

The decision to box off two slots in every team for young talent is a great way of attaining a working legacy in badminton following London 2012, creating stars of the future and inspiring young talent to pick up their shuttlecocks.

Initial reaction to the NBL's creation has been positive and if successful, it may become a blueprint for other sports to follow in future years.

Another positive decision is to implement a spending cap so franchises remain viable in the long term.  This should create a more level playing field with teams unable to spend all their funds on one marquee signing after another.

Attention will now turn to June's player auction, with teams able to bid for their desired players, while bearing in mind the spending cap.  Providing the action is exciting and the league does indeed expand outside it's current narrow catchment area, the NBL can only do good for the future of badminton in the UK.

More Olympic sports content:

"Legacy? What legacy?" ask British basketballers, weightlifters and water polo players as UK Sport funding withdrawn

Chance to shine for 'other' members of the GB Taekwondo Academy at this weekend's National Championships

Wheelchair fencing, football and goalball all lose funding despite big increase for other Paralympic sports

Tuesday, 4 February 2014

"Legacy? What legacy?" ask British basketballers, weightlifters and water polo players as UK Sport funding withdrawn

By Steven Oldham

UK Sport's announcement of Rio 2016 funding cycles has today brought bad news for some Olympic sports.

Great Britain's basketball, weightlifting, water polo and synchronised swimming teams will not receive any central funding at all for the next Olympic Games in Brazil.

These sports join handball and wrestling on the scrapheap, shut out by UK Sport's commitment to awarding medal potential in future Games.

These latest cuts are in contrast to other sports who are celebrating receiving a bigger slice of £350m in funding - the winners include hockey, judo and taekwondo.

Unfortunately, the future is not so bright for the sports without funding - GB teams were entered for the first time at London 2012 in basketball and handball, and the water polo teams entered for the first time in over 50 years.

It was obvious without the experience, infrastructure and pedigree of their rivals the British teams would struggle in these events.  The athletes are not miracle workers - it's the equivalent of expecting Gibraltar to win Euro 2016 despite never having entered continental competition before.

While funding cuts are nothing new to underachieving sports, the promised legacy of London 2012 will be pretty non existent in these sports now.  It's a vicious circle - under performance leads to lower funding, which leads to less money to invest in improving existing talent and attracting newcomers.

Other top-level British Olympic teams have struggled to attract outside commercial sponsorship including rowing, as I blogged last year.  If they found it hard to get a deal with all their medals and extra TV coverage, what chance have a group of synchro swimmers got?

It was commendable for the home nations to be represented in every sport at our home Games two years ago.  It is equally galling for these smaller sports to be swept under the rug now the Olympic goodwill factor has subsided.

Follow @spoldham on Twitter

Search This Blog